Support Free Meals for Arkansas Students
*This is a special post from Arkansas Advocates for Children and Families and Arkansas Hunger Relief Alliance* The federal government is offering...


What would it take to be number one?
Every year, the Annie E. Casey Foundation releases the Kids Count Data Book, a comprehensive, 50-state look at child welfare. Arkansas made...


Poverty guidelines are out of date
Poverty guidelines play two important roles, they are a scorecard for how we are doing as a state, and they help determine...


Investments in health and education paying off for Arkansas kids
Arkansas made gains in health coverage and education over the last year, but the child poverty rate went up to 29 percent....


- View All

Follow Us RSS

Twitter


Facebook


You Tube



What's Happening What's New Sign Up for AACF Action Alerts Subscribe to Our Email Newsletters Join The Kids Count Coalition
The Federal Balanced Budget Amendment: How can something that sounds so good be so destructive?
The Federal Balanced Budget Amendment: How can something that sounds so good be so destructive?
Posted by Brett Kincaid on October 21st 2011



Congressional leaders are indicating that they'll vote before Thanksgiving on a Constitutional amendment to require a balanced federal budget. Such an amendment would limit the amount of money the federal government can spend each year regardless of circumstance.  The Budget Control Act of 2011 - the bill that Congress passed this summer, preventing the country from failing to pay its bills on time - requires both the House of Representatives and the Senate to vote on this balanced budget amendment (BBA).

Many states operate with a similar mechanism. In Arkansas we have the Revenue Stabilization Act that mandates the state budget be in balance before it can be signed into law. This very thing-the fact many states have a BBA or similar instrument-is a common argument in support of a federal balanced budget amendment.

But in reality, states largely balance their budgets thanks to federal government dollars. Let's step outside of Arkansas to look at an example. The following graph shows how Oklahoma has weathered the Great Recession thanks to federal tax dollars.

Thank you, Oklahoma Policy Institute

Oklahoma avoided disastrous cuts during the recession by using federal relief from the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (shown in yellow) to supplement state spending. In 2010, that federal money accounted for more than 12 percent of all state appropriations. The picture is the same nationwide; without an influx of counter-cyclical federal spending, we would have seen devastating job losses in the public sector.

If the federal government had a balanced budget in place, Oklahoma, Arkansas and all other states, would have faced far more dire circumstances than they did. It's hard to imagine the impact cutting programs like Medicaid, ARKids First, and child care would have on Arkansans.   Our state certainly would have faced those choices without our $2.3 billion share of the Recovery Act. (1)

A particularly troubling part of versions of the Balanced Budget Amendment circulating around Washington, D.C. is the requirement that two thirds of Congress-including both houses-must approve any increase in tax revenue. In the current climate it is hard to imagine that two thirds of all Congressional members would agree on the color of the White House, let alone something as difficult as passing a tax increase. The fact is, sometimes we need more tax revenue in order to pay the bills. Much like folks do at their own homes, sometimes we need to take a second job if our current income isn't enough. Once we get things under control, it's easy to drop that second job. But for a short period of time, it's necessary to survive. Under a federal balanced budget amendment, the country would be severely limited-practically prohibited-from that option.

Congress has balanced the budget in the past. It was done without draconian spending cuts or significant tax increases. Through practical budgeting and spending decisions, Congress balanced the budget and operated with a surplus for two years before President Clinton left office. We do not need yet another law telling Congress how to act. We just need members of Congress to look at recent history, to stop playing games, and to do what's right for the American people.

 

 


(1): Recovery.gov



Post your comment

Comments

No one has commented on this page yet.

RSS feed for comments on this page | RSS feed for all comments

Arkansas Advocates for Children & Families
Union Station - 1400 West Markham Suite 306 - Little Rock, AR 72201
Phone: (501) 371-9678 - Fax: (501) 371-9681 - Email: info@aradvocates.org